Loading...

Top
PFQ Banner

This is PokéFarm Q, a free online Pokémon collectables game.

Already a user? New to PFQ?

Sprite Discovery Discussion

Forum Index > PokéFarm > Discussion >

Pages: 123··· 479480481482483··· 748749750

Opalide's AvatarOpalide
Opalide's Avatar
I'm kinda meh on the new sprite. I dont dislike it, but I'm not overy fond on it either. I love the colours of the albino - I personally think that was a fantastic choice! I like the head shape as well. the thing that throws me off is the anatomy. The back right now looks twisted and somewhat awkward - I feel like if the back loop was tighter, the sprite appeared more 'upright' (think: coiling snake) or if the legs were placed further back, it might appear less jarring overall. the normal sprite's colours seem to conflict, perhas this could be solveD by taking the two currebtnt colours, blending them, and taking samples closer to the middle blend? Or by introducing more markings in the rayquaza's colour, to make the transition less sudden. Beyond that, I dont think it's a bad design, but I do think it could be perceived better with a few adjustents Sorry for spelling errors - PFQ doesn't like autocorrect
Niet [Adam]'s AvatarNiet [Adam]
Niet [Adam]'s Avatar

QUOTE originally posted by Canine

The point isn't so much that it's different, but that it's not at all even similar. There's a difference between improving or adjusting a sprite and making an entirely new thing and slapping the same name on top of it.
-cough-Metabbit
Clip from Pokémon anime, re-lined by me
-- OMNOMNOM!
Featured story: Injustice Feedback welcome!
Gumshoe's AvatarGumshoe
Gumshoe's Avatar
Eyyy its fixed now! i cant wait to see the newly-discovered melan when i wake up tomorrow morning
"Who knows? That guy...always keeps you waiting."
Chicken ★ 27 ★ they/them journal shop art shop
credit
★ pfp from Dungeon Meshi ★ sig img from Metal Gear Solid 2 ★ sig code by me
Canine's AvatarCanine
Canine's Avatar
I have no idea what PF1 Metabbit looks like, and even if it was totally different to the new one I'd say the same thing about the naming. It is just a small thing, but it really doesn't make sense to give the same names to different things. But that's just me.
Oliver. Male. 26. Melan Hunt Shop Code BG / Pixel Avatar: hellaonwheels@toyhou.se Sig Art Characters are mine.
nerdofnerds's Avatarnerdofnerds
nerdofnerds's Avatar
Ryukuza is back!! I'm hype as heck about this, I've loved this goofy dragon since pf1. The new sprite design was a surprise, but I like it! I do have a few things I'd like to mention with the design, though. First-the legs seem like they're a bit too forward? I had always interpreted Rayquaza's neat little bumpy backpack as the "middle" of it's back, so the legs hanging from what I see as it's stomach makes them look kind of doofy. But then, it would be hard to see the legs clearly if placed elsewhere, so that's an understandable design choice! And it's a snake-dragon, and those are just tubes, so feet would look a bit odd anywhere, haha. Second-on the albino, the blue used for the ring highlights kind of melts into the satiny purple of the main body ^^; The colors don't quite contrast enough for the rings to pop properly, and that hides one of the high points of the design! If the rings were made more saturated and darker or brighter, I think they would pop much better. That's my opinion, though-I don't know if the sprite colors show up well on other monitors, and I'm certainly not an art team member. Overall, I really like the new Ryukuza and I'm glad it's back on Pokefarm! I'm looking forward to adding it to my Dragon Variant Hunt List next to XD001 and Searene ^^
Icon from the official 07 Ghost manga!
Hakano Riku's AvatarHakano Riku
Hakano Riku's Avatar

Long response to Ledah's post

QUOTE originally posted by Ledah

Please remember that this thread is meant to discuss sprites from this site, not old sprites from the original Pokefarm. Please keep discussion on topic. A reminder about criticisms and critique: It is fine to dislike sprites and to have opinions that are not "Omg this is amazing!" You are entitled to your opinion and we do not mind that. What you are not entitled to do is bash things senselessly just because you don't like them. Saying it's "bad" or "poorly made" is not critique, it is just being rude and unkind to the artists who put a lot of time and hard work into creating these sprites. If you think something about the sprite doesn't work or looks odd, say so politely and offer a suggestion on what you think would work better. We may not implement whatever change a person suggests, but on the other hand, we might; it's been done before. TL;DR, mind your manners when talking about sprites. Don't be a jerk. It's not hard.
Just a bit of a reply to Ledah's comment, as I don't know if I can agree with all that was said. I would personally say that people referencing the old Ryukuza sprite is a legitimate discussion of the current topic, considering the new sprite is a remake of that old sprite as indicated by the fusion's name. If the artists don't want people to bring back up that old sprite, using a different name would have been best ;;' With that being said, nowhere in the site rules does it say we can't bring up old sprites, nor does the purpose of this thread. "This thread is the sister thread of the Sprite Discovery, which came to life to discuss the discovered sprites: how they look like, what's our impressions, etc." If staff doesn't want us bringing old sprites into these discussions even though they are in fact a part of the old alpha version/a previous make of this site (which would be like saying not to reference current fakemon sprites after Niet does the supposed next recode mentioned in the Discord chat a little while ago please do not question or discuss that here though), then create either a rule or add that to the original thread post rather than calling us out on something that isn't an issue otherwise. The last issue I had (I mostly agree with the last two paragraphs, though disagree with saying we are not entitled to speaking our opinions even if maybe a little rude), was that it's "not hard" to "mind our manners". I agree that it's rude and unkind to the artists to criticize their work especially with negative words like "bad" and "poorly made" rather than neutral words like "could use improvement" or "bland compared to XXX" or something. However, might I just say that I never learned how to give constructive criticism until college in the US, at the age of 19? It's a bit silly to expect kids and teens, which are many on this site, and even many older people to all just inherently be able to give effective constructive criticism. It takes a lot of learning and practice to do that, so it is actually, hard to many people..Thus telling users not to voice their opinions even if using negative words will effectively mute a large number of users' opinions, which would be a bit questionable for a community site. Maybe create a post somewhere detailing what is and isn't acceptable - as even what is rude or not is an opinion rather than a fact that everyone knows - if staff can't handle a bit of negative opinions from users..That isn't to say they should suffer disrespect, but disrespect and negative opinions about their work are two separate things. It's also unkind to call those of us who don't know how to give proper feedback jerks for what they believe to simply be their honest opinions, though perhaps uncensored ;w;' Yes it may also be hard to create the sprites, so people should put in a bit of effort to criticize those sprites effectively, but once again the purpose of this thread is not constructive criticism but to "discuss the discovered sprites". If staff want a place for constructive criticism of their sprites void of any negative opinions or feedback, they should create a thread with explicit rules defining what is and isn't allowed to be posted and go off of that thread for their user input; i.e. the post needs to have three valid points backed up by one or more suggested fixes. I will emphasize however, that it is a rule to respect other users, so we do need to be careful not to disrespect the artists and their work..But negative opinions alone are not disrespect x TL;DR: We can reference old sprites until it becomes a rule not to, it's silly to expect positive or neutral opinions and feedback from all or even most users, make a thread for constructive criticism instead of relying on our opinions and/or discussions if you don't like them.
Apologies if anything was left out or worded poorly as it is late, but I'll fix that tomorrow if there're any pointed out issues ;w;'
Onto my own personal opinion though. I do feel like this fusion is a lot more of a splice rather than a blend like Orthrus was, which isn't necessarily a bad thing, but it does reduce the individuality of the sprite itself and thus is a bit more of a miss with me. That is just my thought though as I prefer the uniqueness of fakemon over fusion sprites in general, but I do think it could have done with a little more obvious (I know it has differences to the two, but they aren't all that apparent at a glance) differences from the two original Pokémon ;w; As for the naming of the sprite, I can't say I know exactly what the etymology of it is, but at a guess it's a mesh of the Japanese word for dragon and something else and probably the "za" from Rayquaza. I can't really see a similarity between the old and new Ryukuza except for the Rayquaza base that would warrant the same name, but so long as the etymology makes sense I guess I won't complain xD
Avatar of Dian Rubens from Spice & Wolf
Type Race Score: 0
Type Race Clicklist: HERE
Sei's AvatarSei
Sei's Avatar

QUOTE originally posted by Hayashi Rin

Long response to Ledah's post

QUOTE originally posted by Ledah

Please remember that this thread is meant to discuss sprites from this site, not old sprites from the original Pokefarm. Please keep discussion on topic. A reminder about criticisms and critique: It is fine to dislike sprites and to have opinions that are not "Omg this is amazing!" You are entitled to your opinion and we do not mind that. What you are not entitled to do is bash things senselessly just because you don't like them. Saying it's "bad" or "poorly made" is not critique, it is just being rude and unkind to the artists who put a lot of time and hard work into creating these sprites. If you think something about the sprite doesn't work or looks odd, say so politely and offer a suggestion on what you think would work better. We may not implement whatever change a person suggests, but on the other hand, we might; it's been done before. TL;DR, mind your manners when talking about sprites. Don't be a jerk. It's not hard.
Just a bit of a reply to Ledah's comment, as I don't know if I can agree with all that was said. I would personally say that people referencing the old Ryukuza sprite is a legitimate discussion of the current topic, considering the new sprite is a remake of that old sprite as indicated by the fusion's name. If the artists don't want people to bring back up that old sprite, using a different name would have been best ;;' With that being said, nowhere in the site rules does it say we can't bring up old sprites, nor does the purpose of this thread. "This thread is the sister thread of the Sprite Discovery, which came to life to discuss the discovered sprites: how they look like, what's our impressions, etc." If staff doesn't want us bringing old sprites into these discussions even though they are in fact a part of the old alpha version/a previous make of this site (which would be like saying not to reference current fakemon sprites after Niet does the supposed next recode mentioned in the Discord chat a little while ago please do not question or discuss that here though), then create either a rule or add that to the original thread post rather than calling us out on something that isn't an issue otherwise. The last issue I had (I mostly agree with the last two paragraphs, though disagree with saying we are not entitled to speaking our opinions even if maybe a little rude), was that it's "not hard" to "mind our manners". I agree that it's rude and unkind to the artists to criticize their work especially with negative words like "bad" and "poorly made" rather than neutral words like "could use improvement" or "bland compared to XXX" or something. However, might I just say that I never learned how to give constructive criticism until college in the US, at the age of 19? It's a bit silly to expect kids and teens, which are many on this site, and even many older people to all just inherently be able to give effective constructive criticism. It takes a lot of learning and practice to do that, so it is actually, hard to many people..Thus telling users not to voice their opinions even if using negative words will effectively mute a large number of users' opinions, which would be a bit questionable for a community site. Maybe create a post somewhere detailing what is and isn't acceptable - as even what is rude or not is an opinion rather than a fact that everyone knows - if staff can't handle a bit of negative opinions from users..That isn't to say they should suffer disrespect, but disrespect and negative opinions about their work are two separate things. It's also unkind to call those of us who don't know how to give proper feedback jerks for what they believe to simply be their honest opinions, though perhaps uncensored ;w;' Yes it may also be hard to create the sprites, so people should put in a bit of effort to criticize those sprites effectively, but once again the purpose of this thread is not constructive criticism but to "discuss the discovered sprites". If staff want a place for constructive criticism of their sprites void of any negative opinions or feedback, they should create a thread with explicit rules defining what is and isn't allowed to be posted and go off of that thread for their user input; i.e. the post needs to have three valid points backed up by one or more suggested fixes. I will emphasize however, that it is a rule to respect other users, so we do need to be careful not to disrespect the artists' and their work..But negative opinions alone are not disrespect x TL;DR: We can reference old sprites until it becomes a rule not to, it's silly to expect positive or neutral opinions and feedback from all or even most users, make a thread for constructive criticism instead of relying on our opinions and/or discussions if you don't like them.
Apologies if anything was left out or worded poorly as it is late, but I'll fix that tomorrow if there're any pointed out issues ;w;'
Just want to mention that I agree with you here - There's nothing wrong with comparing the old sprites to their PF1 counter parts. I'll edit Ledah's post to reflect that. As for the discussion about Ryukuza in general, Spoodle is correct in that it was an edit of the gen 4 Rayquaza sprite. Kinchiona made it and as for the direction we decided to go in with it, I recall her mentioning that she just stuck wings onto it because it looked nice and she liked rayquaza / wanted to push an event out with it. There was no rhyme or reason to it other than "I want this". I feel like our revamped hybrid works a lot nicer and the dex description fits in nicely with that meld. Also, since it's a hybrid it is meant to be decidedly smaller than an actual Rayquaza, so that's why there's a size difference. Coloration wise, the normal and albino pull from Flygon while the shiny and melan are their own thing.

Here's the concept art for it, drafted december 2018

Avatar: Novie
selocon's Avatarselocon
selocon's Avatar
I love it, there's just one minor complaint I have: You can't see the yellow! It's almost face-to-screen with the light green. Maybe just a tiny bit darker light green next time? I so missed Kuza, I'm happy to have one.
Avatar by the best lizard ever, Bananalizard #standwithEMS #ELM
Score: 0
SpoodleBug's AvatarSpoodleBug
SpoodleBug's Avatar
yknow what, i think i like this guy actually! mostly out of spite though xD~ That concept art is great ;w; sold me on this noodle I'd like to stress again im not bashing the original sprite. From the earlier post, many of the old sprites were just edits like that one (and lord knows ive made some sprite mashups in the past, good and bad). As I mentioned however, the art standards and abilities of the artists have grown massively since pf1, and they clearly looked at that old edit and went.. nah we can do better. I really do like the new sprite, though yeah i think the yellow's a bit muddy in the lime green like has been mentioned People getting so hung up on the old one just.. really confuse me, it's so basic and.. well, boring, compared to the new, FULLY ORIGINAL sprite ;=; no offense to the original artist but i could do something similar in about 5-10 minutes using mspaint.
Avvy by SimonPetrikov
pixelkitty's Avatarpixelkitty
pixelkitty's Avatar
I actually kinda love this new sprite. My only complaint is the legs seem kind of... off? I can't really put my finger on it. And the yellow is a little hard to see. Edit: I need the shiny! Edit edit: thank you, Sei!
⚢ Sylveon PFP from Pokemon Shuffle

Pages: 123··· 479480481482483··· 748749750

Cannot post: Please log in to post

© PokéFarm 2009-2024 (Full details)Contact | Rules | Privacy | Reviews 4.6★Get shortlink for this page