Loading...

Top
PFQ Banner

This is PokéFarm Q, a free online Pokémon collectables game.

Already a user? New to PFQ?

Real Money Trading

Forum Index > Core > Announcements > News Archive >

Pages: 123··· 2021222324··· 333435

aminahhime's Avataraminahhime
aminahhime's Avatar
grandmaster.pngd.png
I've been following this thread and have been wanted to respond with some questions. If a trade is agreed upon off site, using real money, would that be considered a strike against site rules? It's one thing to clearly state an agreement to RMT in the forums where it's public info. That's a very clear offense. It's also another thing to agree within private messaging on the site (which if staff has the ability to look through pms that's sort of sus, but that's another discussion). But any agreements to RMT made off-site isn't exactly trackable is it? I mean someone can agree to buy a melan off of a user on Twitter for example in private messages and they can receive said Pokemon as a gift. And while it may seem suspicious to receive such a prized Pokemon as a gift, there are instances where it is indeed a gift. I don't see how that could be tracked unless there was hard evidence exposing such a trade was completed. One other thing that just popped into my mind is what if Pokemon were traded for actual objects? And I don't mean art by the way. No money is exchanged in the process, but there is still trade made either way. I don't know if anyone has actually done this, but let's say me, for example, wanted to trade a cute t-shirt for some Pokemon, does that count against the rules as well?
avatar is miwako sakurada from the paradise kiss anime <3
TimelordSnowy's AvatarTimelordSnowy
TimelordSnowy's Avatar
senior.pnge.png

QUOTE originally posted by Lørd Pyrøn

QUOTE originally posted by Eltafez

Q: Were they under the impression that there would be a grace period for all users? Actually, they were under the impression that there would be a grace period. In fact, they pushed heavily for one, to which the resounding answer of myself and others is the same here: no. As I mentioned, they were admonished pretty heavily to make sure they understood and wouldn't do so again. If they had/have, I would have personally made the case with Garthic to have them step down. As for the thread lock, I'm sorry it came off that way. I would've thought that mentioning the time for me would've said as much (I really was pretty tired at the time) but I can see how that doesn't say anything about a potential unlock. I'll keep that in mind going forward.
Now this... angered me more than it (admittedly) should have. Mainly because those staff members have in fact had a grace period, roughly 18 months whilst the rest of userbase got nothing about a final decision. Though unintentional, it ends up giving some of the more aggressive responses a leg to stand on.
Ah, Apologies if I mess this up But I believe it was said staff started seriouslly discussing banning RMT on jan 14th of this year? so it would have been 2 weeks not 18 months.
Avatar: By LonewolfHanzo "Sometimes ya gotta back up to go forward." ~Brain(Happy Feet 2)
Lørd Pyrøn's AvatarLørd Pyrøn
Lørd Pyrøn's Avatar
master.pnge+.png
@TmelordSnowy This thread here says that while the rules have changed says that while the site won't support it, that the door is open to change meaning that at the very least it has been on the minds of the mod team since then.
✸ ✸ ✸ ✸ ✸
Eltafez's Avatarhypermode-12.pngEltafez
Eltafez's Avatar
supermod34.pngbooster.pnghypermode.pngcomplete.pngss.png

QUOTE originally posted by Lørd Pyrøn

QUOTE originally posted by Eltafez

Q: Were they under the impression that there would be a grace period for all users? Actually, they were under the impression that there would be a grace period. In fact, they pushed heavily for one, to which the resounding answer of myself and others is the same here: no. As I mentioned, they were admonished pretty heavily to make sure they understood and wouldn't do so again. If they had/have, I would have personally made the case with Garthic to have them step down. As for the thread lock, I'm sorry it came off that way. I would've thought that mentioning the time for me would've said as much (I really was pretty tired at the time) but I can see how that doesn't say anything about a potential unlock. I'll keep that in mind going forward.
Now this... angered me more than it (admittedly) should have. Mainly because those staff members have in fact had a grace period, roughly 18 months whilst the rest of userbase got nothing about a final decision. Though unintentional, it ends up giving some of the more aggressive responses a leg to stand on.
If I may, I said that only a couple of new staff members - the ones that have joined mid 2021 - have made the mistake of using the information to their advantage. The most recent discussion regarding RMT happened Jan. 14 - a few weeks ago. Before that, there was a time frame of a year in which everything was still okay.
Avatar by me for my personal use only.

Links

Helpful: PFQ Rules | Staff Roster | Help Forums | PFQ Wiki Fan-made Tools: Calculator Personal: Journal
Template © Eltafez
TimelordSnowy's AvatarTimelordSnowy
TimelordSnowy's Avatar
senior.pnge.png

QUOTE originally posted by Lørd Pyrøn

@TmelordSnowy This thread here says that while the rules have changed says that while the site won't support it, that the door is open to change meaning that at the very least it has been on the minds of the mod team since then.
and I was specifically talking about this post by Eltafez yesterday Here I havent been active on this site in 2 years I haven't kept up with the news. Im going off the recent post posted.
Eltafez's Avatarhypermode-12.pngEltafez
Eltafez's Avatar
supermod34.pngbooster.pnghypermode.pngcomplete.pngss.png

QUOTE originally posted by aminahhime

I've been following this thread and have been wanted to respond with some questions. If a trade is agreed upon off site, using real money, would that be considered a strike against site rules? It's one thing to clearly state an agreement to RMT in the forums where it's public info. That's a very clear offense. It's also another thing to agree within private messaging on the site (which if staff has the ability to look through pms that's sort of sus, but that's another discussion). But any agreements to RMT made off-site isn't exactly trackable is it? I mean someone can agree to buy a melan off of a user on Twitter for example in private messages and they can receive said Pokemon as a gift. And while it may seem suspicious to receive such a prized Pokemon as a gift, there are instances where it is indeed a gift. I don't see how that could be tracked unless there was hard evidence exposing such a trade was completed. One other thing that just popped into my mind is what if Pokemon were traded for actual objects? And I don't mean art by the way. No money is exchanged in the process, but there is still trade made either way. I don't know if anyone has actually done this, but let's say me, for example, wanted to trade a cute t-shirt for some Pokemon, does that count against the rules as well?
Sorry, I missed this initially until it was pointed out to me by another colleague. Q: If a trade is agreed upon off site, using real money, would that be considered a strike against site rules? It would be circumventing the rules we have so yes, it would be considered a strike. While we're here, please keep in mind that staff can and will look through Personal Messages if we have valid reason to do so (eg. a report about illicit activity). This is outlined in the rules - "Rule 10: British Laws Apply" specifically. Q: One other thing that just popped into my mind is what if Pokemon were traded for actual objects? I don't really know of anyone who would make physical goods to trade for pixels, but in short... I guess that could work -if- you can make it work?
Vaporgrave's AvatarVaporgrave
Vaporgrave's Avatar
grandmaster.pngc.png

QUOTE originally posted by aminahhime

while it may seem suspicious to receive such a prized Pokemon as a gift, there are instances where it is indeed a gift. I don't see how that could be tracked unless there was hard evidence exposing such a trade was completed
Sorry to be pushy here Elta but I think this is a really good point and would be interesting to see the answer. Especially if say it truly was a gift with no under the table RMT involved. How would you know either way? Would innocent people get bopped through this?
Eltafez's Avatarhypermode-12.pngEltafez
Eltafez's Avatar
supermod34.pngbooster.pnghypermode.pngcomplete.pngss.png

QUOTE originally posted by Exspirita

QUOTE originally posted by aminahhime

while it may seem suspicious to receive such a prized Pokemon as a gift, there are instances where it is indeed a gift. I don't see how that could be tracked unless there was hard evidence exposing such a trade was completed
Sorry to be pushy here Elta but I think this is a really good point and would be interesting to see the answer. Especially if say it truly was a gift with no under the table RMT involved. How would you know either way? Would innocent people get bopped through this?
We wouldn't lock users unless we had substantial evidence. I freely admit it's going to be very difficult to monitor for us, especially if done under the table, but if that's a risk users are willing to place on themselves and on the site, then my hands are tied.
PaintedFence's AvatarPaintedFence
PaintedFence's Avatar
grandmaster.pngd.png

QUOTE originally posted by Exspirita

QUOTE originally posted by aminahhime

while it may seem suspicious to receive such a prized Pokemon as a gift, there are instances where it is indeed a gift. I don't see how that could be tracked unless there was hard evidence exposing such a trade was completed
Sorry to be pushy here Elta but I think this is a really good point and would be interesting to see the answer. Especially if say it truly was a gift with no under the table RMT involved. How would you know either way? Would innocent people get bopped through this?
i really hope staff do pay attention to this. i gifted 5 melans when RMT was still allowed, and 1 soon after the update came out. i dont think getting a melan gifted is "suspicious", it's just rare because melans themselves are rare y'know ? but Elta's response does reassure me, hopefully if i do gift melans again i wont be penalized. thank you for the response, this is just my 2 cents as a Certified Melan Giver TM lol

scott | adult | extra silly free templates pkmn adoptables love yourself or else i'll love you
credits
background: animation by Da Dou coding: by me
schleifi's Avatarschleifi
schleifi's Avatar
grandmaster.pngc.png

QUOTE originally posted by Eltafez

Q: One other thing that just popped into my mind is what if Pokemon were traded for actual objects? I don't really know of anyone who would make physical goods to trade for pixels, but in short... I guess that could work -if- you can make it work?
I mean, an example that comes to mind would be to order something from an online shop and just have it delievered to someone else? I do have some trades that fell through since RMT is now banned, but there could still be an actuall exchange of value in that way. EDIT.: Though I can already think of a few ways that could be messy already^^
Avatar was created for me by ArtsieRosie. I paid for it and own all rights for it.

Pages: 123··· 2021222324··· 333435

Cannot post: Please log in to post

© PokéFarm 2009-2024 (Full details)Contact | Rules | Privacy | Reviews 4.6★Get shortlink for this page