Real Money Trading
Forum Index > Core > Announcements > News Archive >
I've been following this thread and have been wanted to respond with some questions.
If a trade is agreed upon off site, using real money, would that be considered a strike against site rules? It's one thing to clearly state an agreement to RMT in the forums where it's public info. That's a very clear offense.
It's also another thing to agree within private messaging on the site (which if staff has the ability to look through pms that's sort of sus, but that's another discussion).
But any agreements to RMT made off-site isn't exactly trackable is it? I mean someone can agree to buy a melan off of a user on Twitter for example in private messages and they can receive said Pokemon as a gift. And while it may seem suspicious to receive such a prized Pokemon as a gift, there are instances where it is indeed a gift. I don't see how that could be tracked unless there was hard evidence exposing such a trade was completed.
One other thing that just popped into my mind is what if Pokemon were traded for actual objects? And I don't mean art by the way. No money is exchanged in the process, but there is still trade made either way. I don't know if anyone has actually done this, but let's say me, for example, wanted to trade a cute t-shirt for some Pokemon, does that count against the rules as well?
avatar is miwako sakurada from the paradise kiss anime <3
QUOTE originally posted by Lørd Pyrøn
QUOTE originally posted by Eltafez
Q: Were they under the impression that there would be a grace period for all users?
Actually, they were under the impression that there would be a grace period. In fact, they pushed heavily for one, to which the resounding answer of myself and others is the same here: no.
As I mentioned, they were admonished pretty heavily to make sure they understood and wouldn't do so again. If they had/have, I would have personally made the case with Garthic to have them step down.
As for the thread lock, I'm sorry it came off that way. I would've thought that mentioning the time for me would've said as much (I really was pretty tired at the time) but I can see how that doesn't say anything about a potential unlock. I'll keep that in mind going forward.
Avatar: By LonewolfHanzo
"Sometimes ya gotta back up to go forward." ~Brain(Happy Feet 2)
@TmelordSnowy This thread here says that while the rules have changed says that while the site won't support it, that the door is open to change meaning that at the very least it has been on the minds of the mod team since then.
✸ ✸ ✸ ✸ ✸
QUOTE originally posted by Lørd Pyrøn
QUOTE originally posted by Eltafez
Q: Were they under the impression that there would be a grace period for all users?
Actually, they were under the impression that there would be a grace period. In fact, they pushed heavily for one, to which the resounding answer of myself and others is the same here: no.
As I mentioned, they were admonished pretty heavily to make sure they understood and wouldn't do so again. If they had/have, I would have personally made the case with Garthic to have them step down.
As for the thread lock, I'm sorry it came off that way. I would've thought that mentioning the time for me would've said as much (I really was pretty tired at the time) but I can see how that doesn't say anything about a potential unlock. I'll keep that in mind going forward.
Avatar by me for my personal use only.
Links
Helpful: PFQ Rules | Staff Roster | Help Forums | PFQ Wiki
Fan-made Tools: Calculator
Personal: Journal
Template © Eltafez
QUOTE originally posted by Lørd Pyrøn
@TmelordSnowy This thread here says that while the rules have changed says that while the site won't support it, that the door is open to change meaning that at the very least it has been on the minds of the mod team since then.
QUOTE originally posted by aminahhime
I've been following this thread and have been wanted to respond with some questions.
If a trade is agreed upon off site, using real money, would that be considered a strike against site rules? It's one thing to clearly state an agreement to RMT in the forums where it's public info. That's a very clear offense.
It's also another thing to agree within private messaging on the site (which if staff has the ability to look through pms that's sort of sus, but that's another discussion).
But any agreements to RMT made off-site isn't exactly trackable is it? I mean someone can agree to buy a melan off of a user on Twitter for example in private messages and they can receive said Pokemon as a gift. And while it may seem suspicious to receive such a prized Pokemon as a gift, there are instances where it is indeed a gift. I don't see how that could be tracked unless there was hard evidence exposing such a trade was completed.
One other thing that just popped into my mind is what if Pokemon were traded for actual objects? And I don't mean art by the way. No money is exchanged in the process, but there is still trade made either way. I don't know if anyone has actually done this, but let's say me, for example, wanted to trade a cute t-shirt for some Pokemon, does that count against the rules as well?
QUOTE originally posted by aminahhime
while it may seem suspicious to receive such a prized Pokemon as a gift, there are instances where it is indeed a gift. I don't see how that could be tracked unless there was hard evidence exposing such a trade was completed
QUOTE originally posted by Exspirita
QUOTE originally posted by aminahhime
while it may seem suspicious to receive such a prized Pokemon as a gift, there are instances where it is indeed a gift. I don't see how that could be tracked unless there was hard evidence exposing such a trade was completed
QUOTE originally posted by Exspirita
QUOTE originally posted by aminahhime
while it may seem suspicious to receive such a prized Pokemon as a gift, there are instances where it is indeed a gift. I don't see how that could be tracked unless there was hard evidence exposing such a trade was completed
scott | adult | extra silly
free templates
pkmn adoptables
love yourself or else i'll love you
creditsbackground: animation by Da Dou
coding: by me
QUOTE originally posted by Eltafez
Q: One other thing that just popped into my mind is what if Pokemon were traded for actual objects?
I don't really know of anyone who would make physical goods to trade for pixels, but in short... I guess that could work -if- you can make it work?
Avatar was created for me by ArtsieRosie. I paid for it and own all rights for it.
Cannot post: Please log in to post