PFQ Banner

This is PokéFarm Q, a free online Pokémon collectables game.

Already a user? New to PFQ?

Player Reviews

About Reviews

We welcome our players to provide their feedback on PokéFarm Q. Good or bad, your opinion matters! So please, speak your mind. We look forward to hearing from you.

Average rating:
★★★★ 4.59
(1,976 reviews)

Reviews with 80% negative user feedback are excluded from totals.

< View all


Pages: 12345

MoriyaHiroaki: "Awful luck?"★☆☆☆☆

Posted: 10/Feb/2024 12:54:02 (13 days ago)

Votes below threshold, review has been hidden. View

I’d give zero stars I could, Over 200 eggs and no shinies…

👍 1👎 26

Taeko: "boring"★☆☆☆☆

Posted: 28/Oct/2023 17:47:13 (3 months ago)

Votes below threshold, review has been hidden. View

I play this game daily but this game just needs more actives like playing with your pokemon, auctions and some more i wont put in this list but mainly its starting to get boring after a while i get bored of clicking this game should at least allow you to buy autoclicker with zc,gp or credits.

👍 6👎 31

Niet [Adam] replied: 31/Oct/2023 18:33:07 (3 months ago)

Thank you for your feedback, but autoclickers are and always will be against the rules. You appear to have missed the entire rest of the game, as clicking is only a single feature in a very large set of features. Take a look at your Farm page and see what features are there.

rosienroller: "0/5 stars if possible"★☆☆☆☆

Posted: 03/Oct/2023 01:57:00 (4 months ago)

I just personally don't like this site and want to put a rating saying that.

👍 18👎 70

Niet [Adam] replied: 05/Oct/2023 19:01:44 (4 months ago)

Any... particular reason? Anything at all?

InugamiChi: "Pen Pixel Kunst, dårling alt annet. - Norsk"★☆☆☆☆

Posted: 10/Aug/2023 13:57:54 (6 months ago)

Spillet 'Pokefarm' står overfor flere utfordringer som direkte påvirker spillopplevelsen. Fremdriften i spillet er betydelig treg, og mengden engasjerende innhold er begrenset. Dress-up-funksjonen mangler substans, og mye av det tilgjengelige innholdet fremstår som utdatert. Det er spesielt frustrerende at spillet legger til rette for pengebruk, selv om en stor del av innholdet ikke klarer å fenge og virker avlegs. Å investere penger for å fjerne begrensningene knyttet til tidsstyrte oppgaver synes ikke som en gunstig avgjørelse. Dette blir spesielt påfallende når man vurderer at spillet har vært tilgjengelig i lang tid uten synlige forbedringer – noe som kan gi inntrykk av at økonomiske interesser går foran spilleropplevelsen. Det er også flere kommentarer fra andre om administratorers oppførsel og behandling av spillere som er bekymringsverdige. Det kan derfor være mer fornuftig å vurdere å investere tiden din i et annet spill som tilbyr en mer tilfredsstillende opplevelse. :/ På en positiv note, er det verdt å påpeke at spillet har imponerende pikselkunst på Pokémon-sprites, men dessverre virker dette å være den eneste overbevisende faktoren som holder spillet sammen.

👍 32👎 8

Niet [Adam] replied: 11/Aug/2023 12:33:18 (6 months ago)

Takk for din tilbakemelding. Det er riktig at det ikke har vært mye synlig fremgang, men mange oppdateringer har vært bak kulissene. Forbedringer av ytelse og ventetid, samt justeringer av spillingen er gjort. Med litt flaks vil vi ha noe synlig å vise til i nær fremtid.

ArtCactus: "its mediocre at best"★☆☆☆☆

Posted: 31/Jul/2023 05:09:51 (6 months ago)

Its okay. def pay to win. I have been on the site since 2018 but only recently got back into it in hopes of trading my stuff for chicken smoothie pets or something. Its a horrible, slow paced, time waster. Alot of games like this are, but this is by far the most blatant cash grab ive seen.

👍 36👎 43

SmokyCorviknight: "Oh my GAWD this game is TRASH!"★☆☆☆☆

Posted: 31/Mar/2023 19:25:22 (10 months ago)

I've been here for a few years, and over the years (Started in 2020), this game has grown progressively more and more dismal in performance. - They're trying to glorify themselves. "Reviews with 80% negative user feedback are excluded from totals." That's literally what they say on the intro screen! They're literally trying to play down people's opinions, and sometimes just being downright abusive & cruel to other players! I'll admit, Cele is really nice, but the Absol needs to get a psychiatrist. - Toxic people not being handled. -just like another user said, completely similar to Global Pokedex Plus. Layout is similar, Sprites are similar, IDEA is literally the same. -Neit's a downright jerk! I've looked into a few rejected suggestions, and a lot of them are just Neit being mean to the people who suggested things. Some are really groundbreaking, others not so much, but only a select few involve Neit ever being nice to somebody.

👍 76👎 47

Niet [Adam] replied: 08/Apr/2023 14:13:41 (10 months ago)

I would just like to clarify that "Reviews with 80% negative user feedback are excluded from totals" refers to the thumbs-up vs. thumbs-down that users reading your review can use to provide their opinion on whether your review is helpful or spam. You're not the first person to accuse us of using this to "bury negative reviews" and "boost our rating score" but it may come as a surprise to you that our total average review score would actually be **higher** if we did not filter out "spammy" reviews. I feel I must also point out that it appears you have made no attempt at all to engage with the community. I looked to see if maybe you had had a negative experience that might have motivated this review, but found nothing at all. If you want toxic people to be handled, **report them.** While the moderation team does occasionally find and deal with issues proactively, the vast majority of problems are reported by other users to bring them to the attention of the mod team, who then handle it as soon as they can. If "toxic people are not being handled" as you claim, it's because YOU aren't pointing them out to us. We do what we can, but the community has its part to play in helping us do the best we can.

TheRazzleberry: "My honest review after 2.5 years of play, and a 9 month break"★☆☆☆☆

Posted: 25/Nov/2022 06:42:08 (1 year ago)

I recently came back to this game after leaving for 9 months over the RMT debacle. I'll get my biases out of the way immediately, I had these issues before the RMT decision, the RMT decision was just the straw that broke the camels back. Before then I could tell myself that the slim progress I was making after I stopped paying to play could return some dividends, however minor, if I found myself in desperate need. With the removal of those, and 9 months to cool down and play other time wasters, I now want to distill some criticisms that people need to see for this game and add my voice the chorus. -This game is pay to win in the extreme. It is a click-based gatcha game with similar progression rates to things like Clash of Clans, Raid Shadow Legends, etc. but with even less gameplay. It is, essentially, a slot machine for pixels. Now here comes the "technically you can play it for free" yeah, you can do the same in those gatcha games but only if you want to progress at 1/10 the rate and 1/100 the efficiency. Here it may be even worse, especially starting out. You're going to need to drop some cash, get really lucky, or play for months before you see even a modicum of progression. They try to hide "energy" behind their scouring mechanic where you wait real world hours to (maybe) get boxes that (maybe) contain progression elements. Or... you could always drop $20 and get them quicker? If you do not want a really penalizing gatcha run. Now. -The site mods and admins are all extremely deceitful and most are rude and aggressive on top of that. The owner himself fosters a vile environment and finds it acceptable to lash out and talk down to users merely asking questions (once again just read the RMT thread from about 9 months ago and see if that's the kind of guy you want to bring your problems to if you have any, I will especially point out where a user talked about trading with a staff member mere weeks before they implemented a ban on the RMT). -This ties back into my previous point but updates are slow, minor, and usually just facilitate more "fear of missing out" to drive sales. I have no illusions that the site is constructed in a way to make as much money as possible, and I truly believe the RMT debacle (seriously just look up real money trading Pokefarm and read staff comments, that'll give you more than any of these reviews) was nothing but another move to bolster sales. Finally, I'll add, there are plenty of time wasters elsewhere, there are other click based pokemon games skirting the lines of copyright infringement even. I would suggest trying one of those and giving that thread a peek I mentioned before trying this game out. At best it's a streamlined browser based gatcha with terrible customer service, and sometimes outright abusive behavior from staff.

👍 131👎 35

roses are rosie: "bad"★☆☆☆☆

Posted: 06/Sep/2022 23:21:15 (1 year ago)

without hypermode the game sucks

👍 80👎 60

Niet [Adam] replied: 08/Sep/2022 13:42:31 (1 year ago)

Without Hypermode, the game shuts down due to lack of money to keep the server running. Seems like a fair exchange to me.

ShadowEcho: "ngl. disappointed"★☆☆☆☆

Posted: 12/May/2022 21:08:47 (1 year ago)

Not only is it atrociously time consuming to make progress, but from what I've seen, the staff isn't very transparent/responsible. Nevertheless, I'm surprised Nintendo hasn't sued, after all, you're making money off the game (the countless pay to obtain aspects, like hypermode), and Pokémon is a Gamefreak/Nintendo owned property... (While Pokémon uranium gets shut down despite being a free to win fangame. Man...) Also wasn't there another game like this? Feels like déjà vu, and from what I've seen, this one will be replaced by another one? Will you let us take our Pokémon over or nope?

👍 61👎 42

Niet [Adam] replied: 13/May/2022 13:31:51 (1 year ago)

- PFQ is a game that will take a long time to "complete". I realise that's not for everyone but it's not inherently a bad thing just because it's not for you. - Have you seen any of our News/Announcements lately? How much more transparent or responsible do you want us to be? What more do you want from us? Genuine question, since you point out "flaws" but offer no solutions. - Please see the "Copyright notice" linked on every page, as we address this. Uranium was shut down because it cheapened the brand, PFQ adds value to it without detracting from existing stuff, so it's tolerated. - PFQ is a Pokémon collectable game. There are others like it, "collectable games" are hardly a unique idea. I like to think we do things better than other similar games but that's a subjective matter. - I am working on a new game, yes. Game devs tend to do that. Funnily enough we don't tend to enjoy having just one project to work on day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day... In my case, it took about 10 years of non-stop work for me to realise I was burning out and needed to work on something new. I'm sorry that this offends you. Your review is appreciated but I feel you haven't really made any effort to inform yourself before making it... And where you have informed yourself, you are misinformed. I hope this clarifies a few things for you, and if you wish to discuss further you are welcome to contact me.

SilverStreak: "Not worth the time and energy"★☆☆☆☆

Posted: 27/Mar/2022 09:26:20 (1 year ago)

[The contents of this review have been removed by request from the author. -Niet]

👍 27👎 26

Niet [Adam] replied: 30/Mar/2022 12:44:02 (1 year ago)

After discussion with the review author, they have requested I remove the review. This note is being left for posterity.

Pages: 12345

© PokéFarm 2009-2024 (Full details)Contact | Rules | Privacy | Reviews 4.6★Get shortlink for this page