Sending Adopted Pokemon to Fields instead of Party

Suggestion Title: Sending Adopted Pokemon to Fields instead of Party Suggestion Summary: When you have a full party of Pokemon, or eggs, and you want to adopt a Pokemon, instead of sending a Pokemon in your party to a field, I considered sending the adopted Pokemon from the shelter to a field instead. That way, you don't need to move and remove your party Pokemon when you adopt a Pokemon from the shelter. Positive points: It'll make adopting faster and easier. It'll also make sure that any Pokemon you are trying to evolve won't miss out on EXP if a user comes to click you just when you adopt a Pokemon from the shelter. Negative points: I really only see the negative point about it is for newbies and beginners, but yet if their party isn't full, then it automatically goes into their party, but if their party is full, they they get an option to put the Pokemon they adopted into their fields. Reason For Consideration: I'm currently evolving Shiny Pokemon, and having to replace one for a few seconds just to put a Pokemon from the shelter into my fields is a tad inconvinient because I want my shiny Pokemon to get EXP, not the shelter Pokemon I just adopted.

Title is misleading, but I support. It's especially irritating when I'm on a shiny hunt with my party full of eggs, and I can't adopt a Pokémon I need for my Dex or for whatever reason because you can't put Eggs in fields.

This is actually something I was thinking of the other day, when I had a Party full of Eggs, and saw an Umbreon (I'm a hoarder), but couldn't get it due to my full Party, when, if I were able to send adopted Pokémon to Fields, I could have adopted it. I fully support this.

I believe I've seen this before and it was rejected. I can't find it on the rejected subforum though...

_{Then wait for a mod to comment. This is all up to them.}

I think GP vouchers that allows the ability to send one pokemon straight to the fields per voucher might be a plausible alternative.

To Padfoot's point, I specifically remember a thread exactly like this being rejected, and somebody gave an example (not a perfect one, but still) along the lines of, "if you adopt a pet, you can't just have the pet shelter teleport it to your house. If you don't have a way to take it home at that moment you simply can't take it home until later."

_{That makes sense, but this is really all up to staff now. If rejected, then fine, I understand. I just thought it would be nice to either reintroduce it but with better changes or state it if it hasn't been already.}

To be fair, anyone can chime in with their opinions on a suggestion. That's why this forum exists... I'm 98% sure that our comments as the public make an impact on what Noot decides to consider. So I find myself slightly irritated that you keep trying to shut people down who are trying to help you... That being said, I would like the option to adopt and have the pokemon to the fields. But I too remember the thread and the rejection but I can't remember why it was rejected either.

Screenshot from Summary of Rejected Suggestions: As the reasoning was shelter reservations, which are currently on indefinite hold for being re-introduced, this might indeed be subject to reconsideration.