Single post in Staff Transparency Results

So we've got the list, as promised. We used a very basic "1-10" listing, with 1 being "minor" and 10 being "major". Of course, as I said, there's a vague in-between. 5, being the middle, functions as the point that names can start being revealed - but it doesn't necessarily mean they will be. Anything beyond 5 is a definite name-reveal. 1 - Not reading FAQs / asking repeat questions -- Double-posts / SPAM -- Click-begging -- Having more trade threads than allowed 2 - Double-posts / SPAM -- Click-begging -- Having more trade threads than allowed 3 - Double-posts / SPAM -- Mini-modding 4 - Scamming -- Mini-modding -- General breaking the law 5 - Multi-accounting -- Unknowing art-theft -- Scamming -- Staff Impersonation -- Mini-modding -- Staff going rogue / being unfit for their job -- General breaking the law -- Account transferring 6 - Blatant art-theft -- Scamming -- Staff Impersonation -- Mini-modding -- Staff going rogue / being unfit for their job -- General breaking the law 7 - Blatant art-theft -- Scamming -- Staff Impersonation -- Staff going rogue / being unfit for their job -- General breaking the law 8 - Active Slander/Libel aka. lying -- Scamming 9 - 10 - Inappropriate activities involving minors Or--

1	Double-posts / SPAM		Click-begging	Having more trade threads than allowed		Not reading FAQs / asking repeat questions
2
3			Mini-modding
4	Scamming	General law-breaking
5				Unknowing art-theft	Multi-accounting / Account transferring	Staff Impersonation	Staff going rogue
6				Blatant art-theft
7
8		Active Slander/Libel
9
10	Inappropriate activities involving minors

Thanks Niet <3

---

You'll no doubt notice that there are a number of these 'offences' spanning through numbers, like "Double-posts/SPAM" being on both 2 and 3. This is because, depending on the severity of the cases, it could be variable. Of course, we're not taking into account repeat offences here, just first time. The variables are often one of two things - - The severity of the rule broken - The user's attitude You'll also note that we included staff member's going rogue. This is because we've had issues with staff in the past, and of course... We were unable to do anything about it. Now we're going to take an active role in weeding out the bad eggs that pop up, whether they are staff or a normal user. Staff are not exempt from the rules, this is something we are hoping to make clear.